StatutePayFirst punch → last punch

New Mexico · discharged-employee continuing wages · NMSA 1978 § 50-4-4

New Mexico continuing wages (60 days from discharge)

NMSA 1978 § 50-4-4(C): missed 5-day (fixed wages) or 10-day (piece/commission) discharge deadline → wages continue from the date of discharge until paid, not past the 60th day. Classic: 60 days @ $10×8h → $4,800 (CA LC 203 30d → $2,400; LA 90d from demand → $7,200; ID 15d @ $20×8h → $750; OR unpaid $400 no notice → $400; ME $400 after 8-day → $800 LD / $1,200). Demand + refusal required. Quit (§ 50-4-5) → $0. Not CA LC 203. Not La. R.S. 23:632. Not ORS 652.150. Not Idaho § 45-607. Not Maine § 626.

What this page computes

Enter last day worked (discharge), demand date, paid date (or as-of if still unpaid), hourly rate and usual daily hours. The ticket shows daily rate × min(calendar days from discharge, 60). Not a weekly punch OT calculator. Attorney fees and § 50-4-12 costs are out of scope.

How NMSA 1978 § 50-4-4 / § 50-4-5 pays

§ 50-4-4(A): on discharge, unpaid wages that are a fixed and definite amount become due immediately upon demand and must be paid within five days of discharge.

§ 50-4-4(B): task, piece, commission, or other calculated wages must be settled within ten days of discharge.

§ 50-4-4(C): if those deadlines are missed, wages continue from the date of discharge until paid at the same rate received at discharge, recoverable in a civil action. The employee must plead and establish demand within a reasonable time at the place designated for payment and that payment was refused. No recovery for any period subsequent to the sixtieth day after the date of discharge (NM Compilation Commission Chapter 50, 7-1-24 PDF).

§ 50-4-5: if the employee quits, wages are due at the next succeeding payday — no 50-4-4(C) continuation.

In scope

Out of scope

Classic statutory contrast

60 days from discharge @ $10/h × 8h day → 60 × $80 = $4,800.
Same 60 calendar days on CA LC 203$2,400 (30-day cap). 42 days from discharge @ $10×8h → $3,360 here vs CA $2,400.
La. R.S. 23:632 90 days from demand @ $10×8h → $7,200 (this page caps at 60 → $4,800).
Oregon ORS 652.150 8h×30 with 100% unpaid cap, unpaid $400 no notice → $400.
Idaho § 45-607 15d @ $20×8h → $750. Same 15d here → $2,400.
Maine 26 M.R.S. § 626 $400 unpaid after the 8-day gate → $800 LD / $1,200 (2× unpaid, not daily-rate continuation).
No demand → $0. Quit → $0. Paid by day 5 (fixed) → $0.

Sources

FAQ

Is this the same as California waiting time?

No. LC 203 is usual day's wages × min(calendar days from due date, 30) with no demand-and-refusal gate. New Mexico continues wages from the date of discharge, capped at 60 days, only after demand and refusal.

Same as Louisiana R.S. 23:632?

No. Louisiana is the lesser of 90 daily-rate days or wages from demand until paid. New Mexico starts at discharge, not demand, and the cap is 60 days not 90. 90d @ $10×8h is $7,200 in Louisiana and $4,800 here.

Same as Oregon ORS 652.150?

No. Oregon is always 8 hours × hourly × min(30 days), then a 100% unpaid-wages cap unless written notice plus a 12-day fail. New Mexico has no 8-hour fiction and no 100% unpaid cap — the cap is 60 days at the rate received at discharge.

Same as Idaho § 45-607?

No. Idaho is 15 days at the last-employed daily rate with $750 / $500 dollar caps. New Mexico is 60 days from discharge and no $750 cap. 60d @ $10×8h is $4,800 here and $750 in Idaho after the 15-day cut.

Same as Maine 26 M.R.S. § 626?

No. Maine adds 2× the unpaid wage base as liquidated damages after an 8-day remedy gate ($400 unpaid → $800 LD / $1,200). New Mexico continues daily-rate wages from discharge, capped at 60 days — not a 2× multiplier.